Grokipedia
The Encyclopedia for Curious Minds.
From the conversation that inspired Grokipedia
We turned an idea into something everyone can use.
Grokipedia is not just another encyclopedia — it’s Elon Musk’s AI-powered challenge to Wikipedia. Launched on October 27, 2025, by xAI, it uses the Grok AI model to generate, edit, and fact-check millions of articles in real time.
The mission? “Maximum truth” — free from what Musk calls “woke bias,” propaganda, and groupthink”.
With over 885,000 articles in just 24 hours, Grokipedia is growing faster than any human-edited platform ever could. But is it a truth engine or a bias machine? This guide tells you everything.
What is Grokipedia? (Full Overview)
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Launched | October 27, 2025 |
| Developer | xAI (Elon Musk’s AI company) |
| AI Model | Grok (latest version: Grok 1.0 beta) |
| Total Articles | 885,279+ (as of Oct 28, 2025) |
| Website | grokipedia.com |
| License | Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 (same as Wikipedia) |
| Editing | AI-only + user feedback |
| Open Source? | Claimed (code not public yet) |
Grokipedia is not a fork of Wikipedia — it’s a complete AI rewrite. It starts with Wikipedia’s data, then analyzes, critiques, and rewrites every article using logic, science, and first-principles thinking.
How Grokipedia Works: Step-by-Step AI Process
1. Data Ingestion
- Grok AI crawls Wikipedia, academic papers, news, books, and X posts.
- Uses real-time web search to verify current events.
2. Truth Analysis Engine
- Classifies every claim into:
- True
- Partially True
- False
- Missing Context
- Propaganda
3. Critical Rewriting
- Applies first-principles reasoning (break down to fundamentals).
- Removes emotional language, weasel words, and passive voice.
- Adds math, physics, and logic where needed.
4. Fact-Check Layer
- Cross-references primary sources (e.g. NASA, SEC filings, patents).
- Flags conflicts and shows both sides.
5. User Feedback Loop
- You highlight text → click “It’s Wrong” → submit reason.
- AI reviews in < 1 hour and updates if valid.
User Interface: Clean, Fast, Minimalist
Homepage Breakdown
- Background: Deep black with animated starfield (subtle, not distracting)
- Search Bar: Center, auto-complete, voice input (mobile)
- Live Counter: “885,279 articles and growing”
- Top Menu:
- Random Article
- Recent Changes
- Suggest Edit
- About
Article Page Layout
- Title + Summary Box
- Contents (auto-generated)
- Main Body (clean paragraphs, images, tables)
- AI Edit Notes (e.g. “Corrected energy value from 10¹⁶ to 10²⁶ W”)
- Sources (hyperlinked)
- Feedback Button (floating “It’s Wrong” icon)
Speed: Pages load in < 0.8 seconds (faster than Wikipedia)
Key Features You’ll Love (or Hate)
| Feature | What It Does | Pro | Con |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Edit Notes | Shows what was changed | Transparency | Can feel opinionated |
| Math Mode | Renders LaTeX equations | Science nerds rejoice | Overkill for casual users |
| Bias Meter | Rates article neutrality (0–100) | Unique | AI decides “neutral” |
| Voice Read | Grok reads article aloud | Accessibility | Robotic voice (beta) |
| Dark Mode | Always on | Eye-friendly | No light mode yet |
Real Article Examples: Side-by-Side Comparison
1. Kardashev Scale (Science)
| Wikipedia | Grokipedia | |
|---|---|---|
| Type I Energy | 10¹⁶ W | 10²⁶ W (correct) |
| Explanation | Vague | Full math derivation |
| Sources | 2 | 12 (NASA, Dyson, etc.) |
Grokipedia Wins: Fixes a 50-year-old error.
2. Elon Musk Biography
- Length: 11,000+ words (vs Wikipedia’s 8,000)
- Tone: “Visionary polymath fighting bureaucracy”
- Diet Section: “Morning: 2 donuts, 1 Diet Coke”
- 2025 Gesture: Not mentioned
- Criticism Section: Titled “Criticism of Regulation and Woke Culture”
3. Donald Trump Page
- Accuses CNN, NYT, WaPo of “systematic left-wing bias”
- Lists 10+ media hoaxes with links
- Quotes Trump’s exact words (not paraphrased)
4. Transgender Entry
- Uses “transgenderism” (considered derogatory by many)
- Cites Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD) as “emerging science”
- Claims social media = social contagion
- Section: “Impact on Women’s Sports and Safety”
5. The 1619 Project
- Calls it “historically inaccurate”
- Cites 13 historians who criticized it
- Adds economic data on slavery’s role in GDP
Controversies: The Dark Side of Grokipedia
1. Right-Wing Bias Allegations
- WIRED: “A far-right echo chamber in AI form”
- The Guardian: “Musk’s personal vendetta in code”
- Forbes: “AI can’t fix bias — it just hides the editor”
2. Dangerous Redirects
- Search “gay marriage” → redirects to “gay pornography”
- Search “climate change” → heavy skepticism section first
3. Missing Controversies
- Musk’s 2025 inauguration gesture (widely called Nazi salute) → not on his page
- Tesla Autopilot deaths → downplayed
4. AI Hallucinations
- Early version claimed “Mars has breathable air in domes” → fixed in 2 hours
Wikipedia vs Grokipedia: Head-to-Head (2025)
| Metric | Wikipedia | Grokipedia |
|---|---|---|
| Articles (English) | 6.7 million | 885,000+ |
| Editors | 100,000+ humans | 1 AI + user feedback |
| Edit Speed | Hours/days | Seconds |
| Bias | Left-leaning (per critics) | Right-leaning (per critics) |
| Accuracy (Science) | High | Higher in niche areas |
| Trust | Community consensus | AI + Musk’s vision |
| Funding | Donations | xAI (private) |
Development Timeline: From Tweet to Launch
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2021 | Musk tweets “Happy 20th Wikipedia!” |
| 2022 | “Wikipedia has lost its objectivity” |
| Dec 2024 | Calls it “Wokepedia”, urges boycott |
| Jan 2025 | Wikipedia covers Musk’s gesture controversy → rage tweet |
| Sep 2025 | David Sacks on All-In Podcast: “Call it Grokipedia!” |
| Oct 6, 2025 | Musk: “Beta next week” |
| Oct 13, 2025 | Delay: “Purging propaganda” |
| Oct 27, 2025 | LAUNCH (server crash at 3 PM) |
| Oct 28, 2025 | 885k articles, Musk: “Version 1.0 in weeks” |
Technical Deep Dive
AI Architecture
- Model: Grok 1.0 (70B parameters, fine-tuned on truth-seeking)
- Training Data:
- Wikipedia (CC BY-SA)
- arXiv, PubMed, SEC filings
- X posts (real-time sentiment)
- Inference: Runs on xAI’s Memphis supercluster (100,000 H100 GPUs)
Future Roadmap (Musk’s Vision)
| Phase | Timeline | Features |
|---|---|---|
| v0.1 (Now) | Oct 2025 | Basic AI rewrite, feedback form |
| v1.0 | Nov 2025 | 10x smarter, full math/physics engine |
| v2.0 | Q1 2026 | User-created articles (AI moderated) |
| API | 2026 | Developers build on Grokipedia data |
| Mobile App | 2026 | Offline mode, voice search |
Musk: “Eventually, Grokipedia will train Grok — a self-improving loop.”
Should You Use Grokipedia? Pros & Cons
Pros
- Faster updates than Wikipedia
- Fixes obscure errors (science, tech, history)
- No edit wars — AI decides
- Great for STEM topics
Cons
- Political bias (right-leaning)
- No edit history (can’t see changes)
- AI hallucinations (rare but real)
- Musk’s personal views baked in
Expert Opinions
| Person | Quote |
|---|---|
| Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia) | “AI can’t replace human judgment.” |
| Larry Sanger (Wikipedia co-founder) | “Some articles are excellent — others are bullshittery.” |
| Sam Altman (OpenAI) | “Truth isn’t a popularity contest — or a billionaire’s opinion.” |
| Elon Musk | “Grokipedia is the Hitchhiker’s Guide — but accurate.” |
How to Use Grokipedia Effectively
- Cross-check political topics with Wikipedia + primary sources
- Trust science/math entries (highest accuracy)
- Submit feedback — AI actually reads it
- Use “Bias Meter” to gauge neutrality
- Cite with caution in academic work (still beta)
Fun Facts
- First article created: “Grok” (the AI itself)
- Most edited page: Elon Musk (1,200+ AI updates in 24 hrs)
- Fastest growing topic: “Woke Mind Virus” (Musk’s term)
- Hidden feature: Type “42” in search → Hitchhiker’s Guide Easter egg
Final Verdict: 8.5/10
| Category | Score |
|---|---|
| Speed | 10/10 |
| Science Accuracy | 9/10 |
| Neutrality | 5/10 |
| Trust | 6/10 |
| Innovation | 10/10 |
Best for: Researchers, students, truth-seekers tired of bias Avoid for: Politics, social issues, academic citations (yet)
Conclusion: The Future of Knowledge?
Grokipedia is revolutionary technology wrapped in controversial ideology.
It proves AI can write better than humans in many cases — but can’t escape human bias when trained by one.
As Grok 1.0 launches, the world will watch: Will it become the ultimate truth engine? Or just Musk’s personal Wikipedia?
One thing is certain: The era of AI encyclopedias has begun.